Loading

During Langer’s time, with split selection panels, Australia won four Test series, lost three and drew one. They made the semi-finals of the 2019 ODI World Cup and won the 2021 Twenty20 Cup.

One of the strong views expressed by all concerned was that in bringing players and selectors closer together, the intention was to make the difficult conversations more, not less, likely to take place in a way that allowed the team to perform better.

As Bailey put it when similarly questioned last summer: “My only observation would be if someone can show me how being distant and unaware of what the players are going through and what the plans are with the team and the coaching staff and how that’s more beneficial, I’d be all ears.”

That openness will need to come to the fore as the panel looks at transitioning from one generation to another over the next two years. Usman Khawaja, Steve Smith and the injury-prone Josh Hazlewood now look the most likely candidates to fade out of the Test side first. The likes of Cummins, Marnus Labuschagne, Head, Alex Carey and Cameron Green will be the core of the side in 2027.

Neither Head (at the start of the 2023 India tour) nor Starc (at the 2022 Twenty20 World Cup) agreed with the decisions made, but respected the fact they had the chance to offer their point of view and have a conversation, rather than simply being tapped on the shoulder at training and told “you’re not playing”.

Loading

Cricket Australia’s head of team performance Ben Oliver said: “The national selection panel has a strong track record of decisions which have played an important role in the team’s success in recent years.

“This has been underpinned by a selection process which is thorough and informed by a deep understanding of the game, the team and players across all three formats.

“Having professional relationships with players, coaches and staff across the country is a strength that supports this process, and which allows for clear and open communication with players, states and clubs.”

The Warner example is perhaps the most fascinating of all. While Bailey’s panel has been subjected to plenty of criticism for “hanging on to” Warner for a couple of years after many observers felt his time was up, they were not shy in confronting the opener about the finish line.

Loading

In England last year, Warner was compelled to plan for a retirement from Test cricket at Lord’s during the second Ashes match if he did not make runs at the start of the tour.

His conversations with Bailey, McDonald and Cummins were as much about his style of play – needing to be proactive and putting pressure on bowlers – as his aggregates. As it was, Warner contributed well in the Test championship final and at Lord’s, earning the right to play on until January’s farewell against Pakistan.

The irony of all this is that as a proactive left-hander, Warner may well have been a more difficult opponent for Jasprit Bumrah than Nathan McSweeney has so far proven to be. Warner was speaking in jest at the start of the summer when he made himself available for selection against India. But several of the figures wondering if Warner had stayed on for too long were happy to admit on Thursday that his value for Australia was now being clearly seen in hindsight.

Whatever Lehmann may think, the reality is that hard decisions are still made by selectors – just in a manner that is less likely to leave players feeling confused or embittered about the way things have panned out. The hardest decisions, though, are looming fast.

News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport are sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.