After working hard her whole life and raising a family, Debra Moxon had always hoped to retire by the time she was 60 so she could travel.

But that birthday came and went and the grandmother was still working as a nurse, still renting, and still struggling to accumulate the super she needed.

Then she decided she’d had enough.

She walked away from the career she had once loved, bought herself a campervan with some of her super, and set her sights on travelling around Australia with her little dog.

“I’ve never been out of work my whole life, so it’s a really big thing [for me],” Ms Moxon said.

“So many people have horrible things happen to them and they pass away and they haven’t done [the things they wanted to]. You know, you only get one chance.” 

To prove to herself she could, she drove her new home on wheels 2,600 kilometres from Adelaide to Townsville in just three days.

Super tax concession to worsen gender divide

While it is a good seven years before Ms Moxon is eligible for the age pension, she said she “definitely” will not have enough superannuation for retirement.

It is a common story for many women in Australia where superannuation is the biggest driver of wealth inequality.

But according to research published by think tank The Australia Institute, the federal government’s super tax concessions exacerbate income and gender inequality even further.

The concessions, which will be given to those who make voluntary contributions to their super, will overwhelmingly benefit high-income earners, the report said.

The Australia Institute lead economist Greg Jericho said the current system of superannuation tax concessions would soon outpace the age pension in costs to the federal government and ultimately leave low-income earners, women, and small business owners in the lurch.

“[In Australia], we are very much on the low end of the scale when it comes to incomes and, unfortunately, we’re at the high end of the scale when it comes to the proportion of people over 65 who are in poverty,” he said.

“When you’ve got a situation or retirement policy based on how things were in the 1980s and the 1990s, it may be time to change the way we think.”

And he said if the situation remained unchanged, the gap between those who retired in poverty and those who retired into wealth would only widen.

“We will be in this rather absurd situation where it is costing the government more to provide benefit to wealthy people than it is to provide benefit for lower–middle income earners,” Mr Jericho said.

Tax system failing many

Before becoming a nurse 20 years ago, Ms Moxon had worked in aged care. 

Then she spent a decade buying, renovating, and selling cafes with her then-husband while raising her two daughters.

“That was the best and worst time of my life. I used to work 100 hours a week, but I absolutely loved that work, but that was 10 years out of my superannuation,” she said.

“The amount [in my super] is just minuscule. [The system is] pretty useless.”

Mr Jericho said the system needed to be rethought, as other elements like the cost-of-living crisis and Australia’s ageing population come into play.