“I had a very long first-round match – three hours, 14 minutes, 7-5 in the third set – and I was really not in good shape before that because I was injured, and didn’t really have a good start to the season. It’s unbelievable that I’m standing here.”

Navratilova was in the stands to watch her fellow Czech join her as a Wimbledon champion, but it was Novotna who had an enduring influence, from the time a teenage Krejcikova and her mother knocked on her door asking for advice.

There were emotional scenes post-final when Krejcikova, with Wimbledon chair Debbie Jevans, saw her name alongside Novotna’s on the honour board.

“Everything that happened in that moment definitely changed my tennis life,” Krejcikova said.

“When I finished uni, I didn’t know what to do … Jana was the one who told me I had the potential and should definitely turn pro and try to make it. Before she passed away, she told me to go and win a slam, and I achieved that. I never really dreamed I would win the same trophy that Jana did in 1998.”

Krejcikova not only battling her opponent on Saturday but also regularly a pro-Paolini crowd who vigorously latched onto the Italian as soon as she started slowly.

She had to recover mentally at the start of the final set after drowning in a sea of errors as Paolini’s mid-match resurgence threatened to snatch the title from her grasp, then again as she wobbled with the finish line in sight.

Twice Krejcikova staved off break-back points while trying to serve out the final, only to produce two of her best points for the match. She knocked off a volley on the first, then bravely clipped the sideline with a forehand – surviving a Paolini challenge – to save the second.

They ultimately proved more decisive than Krejcikova’s wild backhands that almost gave Paolini another life. On the Czech’s third match point, she finally saw off her determined rival to spark celebrations.

Krejcikova navigated her way to her player box after a false start – firstly sharing a moment with Paolini’s support crew, then skipping into her own team’s area, where she was buried in an emotion-charged bearhug.

Earlier, Paolini risked being blown away in back-to-back slam finals after Krejcikova raced through the opening set for the loss of only two games and 19 points.

The popular Italian lost five of the first six games, and quickly became the favourite in a London crowd baying for a competitive final. They roared with glee after Krejcikova’s unforced errors and even her back-to-back double faults to start the third game of the second set.

Paolini did not seem particularly nervous in the early going, and she stuck with the aggression that has been the key to her breakout season, but Krejcikova’s efficiency served her wonderfully in an almost-flawless opening set.

Loading

Krejcikova sent down more double faults than any other woman at this tournament, but missed only two first serves in the opening set and conceded just three of those points.

That pace was always going to be tough for her to maintain, but the manner of her collapse in the second set was still surprising. Perhaps, Krejcikova’s mind began racing about what she was on the verge of achieving.

Paolini’s wristy wind-up on her forehand started poking holes in her rival’s defences, but Krejcikova did not help her cause with a series of loose errors that never looked like happening a set earlier.

Not even a fluffed overhead from Paolini could halt her momentum, after which she dropped to the centre court turf in embarrassment and grinned.

That gave Krejcikova the chance to break back, but Paolini wriggled clear for a 3-0 lead, and soon enough had forced a final set where they finally met in the middle after two lopsided sets.

The first big moments arrived in the seventh game after both players traded holds up until that stage. Paolini fell in an 0-30 hole, then staved off a break point in typically gutsy fashion before letting go a guttural roar.

It was only a brief reprieve. On the next break point, Paolini unsuccessfully challenged a first-serve fault, then sent down her only double fault of the match to fall behind for the first time since the opening set.

Devastation for Aussies in doubles final

Australians Max Purcell and Jordan Thompson have suffered an agonising defeat in the Wimbledon men’s doubles final that denied them a maiden grand slam title together.

In a final dominated by serve and without a single break for the match, Brit Henry Patten and emotional Finn Harri Heliovaara outlasted Purcell and Thompson to claim a 6-7 (7-9), 7-6 (10-8), 7-6 (11-9) victory in a near-three-hour final.

The Australians were the only team to earn a break point, but failed to convert all three of them across the last two sets, including after restricting Heliovaara to 15-40 at three-all in the third set.

They also could not capitalise on three match points late in the second set.

The centre court crowd laughed after Thompson said he was “beyond devastated”, only for Purcell – who won the title two years ago with Matt Ebden – to quickly leap to his defence: “Don’t laugh at him.”

“Plain and simple, it just sucks,” Thompson said.

“It would have been nice to play the extra two sets this time, but I’m glad it was a great match for the crowd,” Purcell said. “I’m super happy for the boys. Enjoy it, guys.”

“Being one point away from being a Wimbledon doubles champion [is tough], but [we were] 5-2 up serving in the second-set buster, and I had the ball right in front of me, and it’s just clipped the net cord and gone over me – and that turned things around. It can change quickly, but we had other chances.”

Purcell, who brought two beers to the post-match media conference, bemoaned Wimbledon’s decision last year to change the doubles format to best-of-three sets, but is already eyeing the US Open for redemption as they also target the end-of-year Tour Finals.

“After a few minutes, it’s a tennis match. They played well, they deserved it,” Purcell said.

“I thought we played pretty well, we didn’t get broken all match, didn’t face a break point – there’s nothing we could do … a couple of pretty lucky returns from their part, which saved it, but that’s tennis, that’s luck, that’s doubles especially. It’s a s— show out there in doubles.

“I’m proud we made the final. It’s the best run Jordan and I have had in a slam, so we can’t be mad.”

The Purcell-Thompson combination were up a mini-break three separate times in the final-set tiebreak – and as late as 8-6 up – but their rivals repeatedly fought back, as they did from 5-2 down in the second-set tiebreak.

Purcell saved a match point with a 211km/h first serve out wide to knot the tiebreak at nine-all, but Thompson crossed slightly early on the next point and Heliovaara and Patten made them pay. Thompson then dumped his forehand return into the net to seal defeat.

Purcell was bidding to become just the second Australian in the Open Era to win Wimbledon doubles titles with separate partners.

Loading

Doubles legend Todd Woodbridge, who partnered Mark Woodforde to six All England club championships and three more with Jonas Bjorkman, is the only other Australian to achieve Purcell’s feat.

In better news for Australia, 16-year-old rising star Emerson Jones moved a step closer to emulating Ash Barty’s 2011 junior girls’ title with a 7-5, 6-1 win over sixth-seeded American Iva Jovic.

Jones’ exceptional backhand did much of the damage as she set up a rematch of the Australian Open girls’ final with world junior No.1 Renata Jamrichova.

Marc McGowan is at Wimbledon with the support of Tennis Australia.